The complaint against Supreme Court Justice Kabub - justified • The Commissioner: "His version is puzzling""

March 27, 2024   

The Ombudsman for Judges, Uri Shoham, announced today (Wednesday) in a precedent-setting and unusual manner, that Supreme Court Justice Khaled Kabub sat illegally and made a decision in a case concerning his children - and that the Supreme Court Justice's version should be questioned. Who is the governor Rabbi Aharon Shlifa appeared with at the dedication of the house? • Watch until the end In response to the complaint by the Lavie and Belmo organizations, the Ombudsman for Judges wrote: "One must be puzzled" about the version of Supreme Court Justice Khaled Kaboob, "since, to the request for an injunction and injunctions, a settlement agreement was attached in which the judge's children appear as representatives of the defendants and his son Walid Kaboob signed as the one who approved it. I believe that a review of the case in question and its appendices (although they are numerous), as the judge himself noted in his decision that he did, would have easily revealed that his children are connected, either directly or indirectly, to the proceedings, and that he should have not heard the case, and certainly not made any decision on the matter." The complaints were filed with the Ombudsman for Judges, after journalist Avishai Greenzig revealed in Kan News the serious findings regarding Judge Kaboob's conduct. The Lavi organization calls on the Judicial Selection Committee not to accept a judge who abused his office and acted in a conflict of interest, but to act in accordance with its authority and order the removal of Supreme Court Justice Khaled Kabub. It should be recalled that, according to reports by Avishai Greenzig in Kan News, Supreme Court Justice Khaled Kabub was documented in a series of posts on social media, which promote the law firm of his daughter Miriam Kabub, which allegedly violates the rules of ethics for judges.